I wrote:

"Here is a hypothetical situation to ponder. Suppose Mizuno uses conventional nuclear theory as a working model for his experiments. Suppose this 'works' in the sense that he makes progress toward better control of the excess heat and higher power levels. . . ."

In real life Mizuno depends entirely on chemical theory. He assumes that whatever the effect is, it is being produced (or triggered) by conventional chemical catalysis. So he is doing all that he can to enhance the catalytic effect, such as cleaning off the platinum screen and raising the temperature. This seems to be working.

As far as I know, he does not have a working model of the nuclear reaction, although he does speculate about it. He has discussed this experiment with Takahashi and other physicists, but as far as I know they have not given him useful advice.

When I say "useful advice," I mean something like: "try increasing the gas pressure" "mix in more helium" "give the cell a heat pulse" or what-have-you. You might call this "actionable" advice. If hydrino theorists can come up with something along these lines, perhaps you should communicate with Mizuno and suggest that he try it. I mean concrete, specific suggestions that can be implemented and will produce a measurable results with this experimental setup. (To be accurate I should say: "steps that you predict or hope will produce a measurable result . . ." It is understood that you may be wrong.)

I do not mean, for example, that you should suggest a spectroanalysis that would confirm these are hydrinos. I do not see how that knowledge would do Mizuno much good.

- Jed

Reply via email to