Mike,
> The fact that the hydrino gases can be liquified at LN temperatures is very significant ... I would call it more than significant. What other explanation can there be? You have a gas - which under various different and reliable tests shows up as pure hydrogen, yet that gas can be condensed at LN temps. How does the skeptic counter that? Even if they say "previously unknown allotrope of hydrogen" - hey, that alone is earthshaking, a Nobel class of discovery -- and as I suggested in the previous posting: is worth billions to NASA in the form of savings from collecting hydrogen in orbit and condensing it there instead of shuttling it up - since the average temperature in space (shaded from Sol) is already lower than LN temps. Why doesn't Mills get samples off to prestigious labs? ... this could be as close to the 'nail in the coffin' of irrational skepticism as he can get - short of a public demonstration of a self-powering unit. Seems like a missed opportunity to me.... Jones
