Michel Jullian wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Michel Jullian <[email protected]>wrote:
> Come on, it doesn't make sense to keep experimenting for 20 years when > you have an undisputable proof at hand, and tritium decay counts are > the most undisputable proof you can dream of. Tell that to the skeptics! You are preaching to choir here. Yes, of course we agree this is indisputable. But the skeptics dispute it! Taubes says it is fake. What can we do to convince people who do not believe in experimental evidence. The x-ray film shown at LENR-CANR from BARC was produced by tritium in Ti. It should have convinced everyone too, but the skeptics pretend it does not exist. Besides, I dug out the original paper ( > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SzpakSonthebehav.pdf ), it doesn't say > that the tritium _content_ increased ten fold, it says that the > tritium _concentration_ increased ten (seven, actually) fold, which is > quite different, and can much more easily have a mundane explanation. No, there is no easy, mundane explanation. Szpak et al. would have found it. And in other cases tritium has increased much more than this. Will et al. observed increased up to a factor of 64 as I recall. Others have observed it at 1000 times background: http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ChienCConanelectr.pdf There is no chance people at 100+ labs all made a mistake, and did not notice a mundane explanation. No skeptic has ever proposed a mundane explanation. - Jed
