Hi Thomas, OrionWorks wrote:
> The first hurdle is making the machine self powering, however, > there is a higher hurdle, economic feasibility. IMHO, there > are better technologies than magnetic motors. I respectfully disagree on a specific point. Assuming the technology is legitimate, there may indeed be economic hurdles to overcome. With that said, however, the implementation of the technology itself could not be simpler to roll out. > I have often > thought that a magnetic motor could be the basis of a battery > charger which would be a great toy. You put a rechargeable > battery in it, spin the flywheel, and later you have a > recharged battery. IMHO, this would be just the toy for the > yuppie who has too much money for his own good. I'm going > to suggest this to Steorn. Now that I think of it, there is > such a machine, it's called a Bedini Motor. The point of possessing permanent magnet technology (assuming it's legitimate) is that in many cases you DON'T EVEN NEED to charge batteries to produce electricity. What for??? Generating electricity would be a redundant step as a means to an end. If one needs power (like electricity) to turn a crank shaft it's ludicrous to use a magnetic motor to power a generator to generate electricity to generate power to turn the crank shaft of the contraption that needs power - when all one really needs to do is simply hook up the magnetic motor DIRECTLY to the contraption's crank shaft. It would be so much more simple to maintain too. Magnetic motors could turn out to be an absolute g_d send to developing countries that desperately need a cheap method of pumping water to irrigate their crops. No need for electricity. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
