----- Original Message -----
From: Terry Blanton <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, February 5, 2009 10:41 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:well, steorn have launched

> Yeah, what MJ said: neodymium.  I misspelled it.
> 
> Well, after many nights of cogitation, I think I finally understand
> what Steorn is saying.  Their claim is that magnetic force is time
> variant.  This is a remarkable claim.
> 
> Energy is force applied over a distance and is time invariant.  It
> doesn't matter if  it takes you a second or a year to lift the bucket
> of water, the energy expended is the same (except for higher order
> effects which we will ignore here).  Steorn says that the energy
> expended to separate magnets varies with the time you spend doing the
> separating.  I believe this would be a violation of the laws of
> thermo.
> 
> I am trying to come up with an experiment that we can perform with 
> our equpment.
> 
> Terry

Would it be more accurate to say magnetic force is velocity variant
instead of time variant? 

eg. The force of friction between a curling stone and the ice tends to
decrease with increasing speed. Consequently it takes less force to push
a curling stone over a set distance at a constant speed of v1 then it
does at a constant speed of v2, when v1 > v2.

Harry

Reply via email to