Jones Beene wrote:
Mr. Beene It appears that you are still in a position of (non-acceptability) here. Are you not the same informed Mr. Beene that informed Dr. Stiffler of the need to file a provisional patent on his burning water system when provisional patents were discontinued some 13 months prior? Are you not the same Mr. Beene that was mentoring a student which was using Dr. Stifflers circuits and who's father was going (by your say so) going to file application on a patent to grab the systems? Are you not the same Mr. Beene that admitted in an email that you were under a conflict of interest because of the association with said student and did this discourse not lead tot he release of Dr. Stiffler into the Public Domain the Circuits for this System to prevent you associates from filing such patent applications? If I am in error Sir forgive me, yet documentation does indicate that you are indeed this individual! Please advise me and my firm if you have any scientific evidence that would refute Dr. Stifflers actual claim and work? |
- [Vo]:Replications of zero current electrolysis J. Klum
- Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electrolysi... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electro... J. Klum
- Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electro... thomas malloy
- [Vo]:Threat of nuclear war is low Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electrolysi... mixent
- Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electrolysi... Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electro... J. Klum
- RE: [Vo]:Replications of zero current ele... Mark Iverson
- Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero current... Terry Blanton
- Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero cu... Stephen A. Lawrence

