Jones Beene wrote:
When you say "zero current" - how was this measured? The SEC does draw  current, even if it is in the few milliamp range.

Also why would you say that AC electrolysis does not evolve gas from both electrodes?

It does. Dr Andrija Puharich was doing this nearly 30 years ago...




From: J. Klum <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2009 12:12:23 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electrolysis

Vortex mired down in political  involvements seems to be missing the fact that progress is being made in the world of electrolysis by replications of a persons work that was drummed out of the vortex realm.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQCvvCngev0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlqSrHBviGo

A circuit where both electrodes evolve H2 is something that can not be accepted.

Enjoy! JK.


No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.11.5/1979 - Release Date: 3/1/2009 5:46 PM
Mr. Beene

It appears that you are still in a position of (non-acceptability) here. Are you not the same informed Mr. Beene that informed Dr. Stiffler of the need to file a provisional patent on his burning water system when provisional patents were discontinued some 13 months prior? Are you not the same Mr. Beene that was mentoring a student which was using Dr. Stifflers circuits and who's father was going (by your say so) going to file application on a patent to grab the systems?

Are you not the same Mr. Beene that admitted in an email that you were under a conflict of interest because of the association with said student and did this discourse not lead tot he release of Dr. Stiffler into the Public Domain the Circuits for this System to prevent you associates from filing such patent applications?

If I am in error Sir forgive me, yet documentation does indicate that you are indeed this individual!

Please advise me and my firm if you have any scientific evidence that would refute Dr. Stifflers actual claim and work?



Reply via email to