Jeff Fink wrote:
> LC50 for CO2 is 100,000 ppm.  OSHA limits are 5,000 ppm.  2009 Ambient
> atmospheric levels are 389 ppm. Like I said, double the ambient level and it
> will have no noticeable effect on human breathing!
> 
> This whole business comes back to politically trumped up effects on global
> warming.

And this is a fine example of proof by assertion.

It's a "politically trumped up" effect, for sure; we know this because
Jeff Fink and Rush Limbaugh and lots of other people have said it, many
times, and that proves it.

Right?  Of course, it's right -- if we say it three times, it's true,
everybody knows that, in fact it was a well known mathematician who
first documented that method of proof.

And Al Gore certainly invented global warming; we know that, too,
because Jeff Fink and Rush Limbaugh and others have said so, more than
three times each.

Funny how climate scientists had run across the problem long before "An
Inconvenient Truth" came out.  But then, that's synchronicity for you.

> 
> Jeff
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 1:53 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:first day in carbon capture
> 
> Jeff Fink wrote:
> 
>> If you put me in a room where CO2 is double the ambient, I won't even
>> notice.
> 
> Oh come now! This is not a serious argument. If I put you in a 
> Japanese hot spring bath for a half-hour you would probably find it 
> pleasant. If a million acres of Georgia land were inundated with 50 
> deg C water filled with sulphur it would be a disaster.
> 
> Please, give us a break. This is a science forum. You can't just toss 
> out the last hundred years of climatology and substitute a statement 
> about how you would fare if you were put in a room with a lot of CO2. 
> That's got nothing remotely to do with climatology, and you know it.
> 
> - Jed
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to