If you put me in a room where CO2 is double the ambient, I won't even
notice.  If you put some potted plants in there with me they will love it
and grow like crazy.  Vegetation on this planet is starved for more CO2.

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: leaking pen [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 10:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:first day in carbon capture

Well, this is a science forum, so lets test that. And we will do so in
true science fashion, by attempting to DISprove our theory.
So, our theory is that co2 is NOT a pollutant.

To test that, hows about we lock you in a room and pump in co2? see
what it does....

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Jeff Fink <[email protected]> wrote:
> Repeat after me 100 times:  CO2 is not a pollutant.  CO2 is not a
> pollutant.  CO2 is not a pollutant.  CO2 is not a pollutant.  CO2 is not a

>
>
>
>
> If we have to capture the carbon in CO2, then we really can’t burn it in
the
> first place.
>
>
>
> Funny how we are willing to build Nuclear plants for other countries, but
we
> are going to stick ourselves with windmills and solar collectors.  Half of
> Iran is sun baked desert, but even they won’t take solar power over
nuclear.
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 9:11 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Vo]:first day in carbon capture
>
>
>
> My first day in the carbon-sequestering group went well.  The technology
is
> proprietary so I cannot share it with this group.  I can, however, share
> some items.  In the year 2020 all power plants will be required to
sequester
> their carbon emissions.  They will be required to capture 90% of the
emitted
> carbon.  There are many technologies to capture carbon.  The ones that can
> capture carbon at a 90% rate are very capital and energy intensive. 
Capital
> costs could equal the cost of the original generating plant.  Energy costs
> could reach 30% of generation.  Efforts are underway to reduce these
costs.
> There does not appear to be an easy way out.  The company I work for has
the
> only working, in operation, technology in North America.  That's good.
>
>
>
> I do not know how the utilities and rate payers are going to be able to
> sustain these costs.  Perhaps a goal of 25% capture would be more viable.
>
>
>
> I am still learning and studying this stuff.  Jed we need cold fusion now
> please.
>
>
>
> Frank Z
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps!



Reply via email to