Agreed. On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Steven Krivit <[email protected]>wrote:
> Any or all of us could take responsibility in helping to maintain the > effectiveness and integrity of the list. > > I was not acutely aware that RELIGION and POLITICS were inappropriate > subjects here until this recent flare-up. I, of course, thought they were > OT, but tolerated. > > Now if the word from our sponsor (Bill) says that, in fact, RELIGION and > POLITICS are inappropriate here, then I won't hesitate to jump in and remind > someone about that if I notice it. Nor should anyone else, IMO. > > Once the reminder is placed in the thread, a yellow (or red) flag is > raised. The person is reminded that they have the option to move the thread > over to the other forum. Simple and polite. If they don't move it, or they > argue, they're bucking for a ban. > > It is our way of helping Bill to provide this service for us. This is how > community works. We make and abide by certain rules and we collectively > support them. > > Yes? > Anybody else agree with this? > Anybody else willing to help watch the list for (purely) RELIGION and > POLITIC threads? (I presume that threads about energy politics are > acceptable.) > > Steve > >
