Yes,
It is actually one of the paths that led me into adopting
Naudts' relativistic solution in that everyone was assuming the hydrogen
orbital must be getting smaller because the only other variable in the
energy equation was Planck's constant - or not so constant from a
relativistic perspective :_)
It is the opposite side of the same coin - I call it Lorentz contraction but
you can also say Plank's constant gets smaller as the ratio of small to
large vacuum flux
Increases- I would even propose that it becomes much larger as the ratio
goes in the opposite direction approaching C or an event horizon.
I just converted a power point to html that touches on this
http://www.byzipp.com/energy/excessHeat.htm
Fran
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 2:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Vo]: PhysOrg article on breaking Plank's law
It could also be relevant to the thread on Casimir cavities, and the
possibility of seeing excess heat from the simply expedient of adding a
nano-structured "source" of Casimir cavities, such as Raney Nickel, to an
appropriate medium.
Arata Zhang on a budget, so to speak.
From: Chris Zell
Thank you for posting this. While it deals with the micro level of reality,
it still illustrates the problem with reductionism and saying that something
is impossible because it violates a physical "law".
