From: Chris Zell 

 


*  A flow of current tears a couple Hydrogen atoms loose but somehow the now
free Oxygen only appears a zillion skillion light years away (relative to
being an atom) at the other electrode.  How this communicates across a vast
expanse of random billiard balls whacking around is beyond me.  

 

Chris - the spy part, and the 'impossible transfer' of oxygen over a
relatively large distance -sounds much interesting as a fictional story, but
the reality of the situation is much more mundane. No magic here, at least
not until we bring in the "replacement actors" (fractional hydrogen etc).

 

On the cathode, a "temporarily free" or transient proton (protons are almost
always temporarily free) is "captured" by electrostatic attraction to the
negative charge on the metal surface - and immediately pairs with another
proton . but the molecular species that is left in the general vicinity of
the "donor" water molecule, is the hydroxyl ion, not oxygen. And the ion
does not need to go far to complete the transaction.

 

This OH- ion which has lost a proton, and which is identical to all of the
zillion, skillion other hydroxyls which are present in the electrolyte, does
not really need to move more than a few angstroms spatially - since it has
an identical twin, which is close to the anode, and it is that remote twin
which provides the oxygen for the bubble forming over there on the anode .
way, way over there. IOW any hydroxyl ion is "fungible" and only moves
slowly although the net flow of current is rapid. 

 

So - in effect, the first hydroxy near the cathode is merely a replacement
for another one, and for something which can happen later - and there is a
slow migration, over millions of iterations - rather than a magical and
instantaneous jump - over a vast expanse of little billiard balls. In a way
this is similar to current flow in normal metal conduction where the
so-called "drift velocity" of electrons is slow compared to the emf, which
is about half of lightspeed in conductive metals.

 

Jones

 

 

Reply via email to