Stephen wrote: <...> I can't help but think any assertion that expressing any particular belief "should be ILLEGAL [in the United States]" must be nothing more than a personal expression of frustration, or possibly a straw man set up to start an argument. <...>
I think what NP was referring to was for the UK, and he said or implied that there is precedence for such a thing there and that he was basically optimistic that it could happen. We First Amendment huggers (believers) here in the US tend to react less favorably to such moves than do the poor blighted furriners in Europe who have demonstrated a tendency to embrace true tyranny over the years. But like I said, our worst mistake would be thinking it can't happen here. - R.
