Michael - Thanks for the link. Hardly anything smells as bad to a greenie liberal these days as an oil company lobbyist, but the old saying: the enemy of my enemy is my friend. I can appreciate anyone helping to reveal or hold forth against the AGW hoax and the accompanying fraud being perpetrated against us even if their contribution is discredited in many people's eyes because of their industrial or political affiliations. I endorse the changes Cooney made to the documents, as they were appropriate and truthful corrections to lies and distortions such as "may be (occurring)" inserted in place of the incorrect "is (occurring)". TMK Cooney and the Bush administration did not actually suppress the reports or attempt to hijack science like these climate hoaxers are doing and has been recently revealed, but I wish they had since this stuff is completely fraudulent to begin with. Remember too that this was for an administration based policy, and is subject to whatever the administration wants to say or not - it's a political prerogative in the first place. All administrations, current included, have the right to control what they themselves say or release, and should continue to have it.
GW may be (has been?) happening, but there is no scientific basis to AGW claims, although I believe people should have the general freedom to publish for either one, or just about anything else for that matter in the proper venue. That's one of the main points arising from "climategate", but it's not the only one, despite attempts by hoaxers and true believers to spinimize the damage. R.
