> I'm asking because I can't recall anybody ever quoting documents from that > office.
The NYTimes did (this must be the paper the French journalist refers to in his blog and documentary): http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/08/politics/08climate.html Michel 2009/12/10 Stephen A. Lawrence <[email protected]>: > > > On 12/09/2009 05:51 PM, Michel Jullian wrote: >> >> You're right Rick that suppression can occur even in the US: >> >> http://premiereslignes.blogs.nouvelobs.com/archive/2009/12/08/enfumes.html >> >> (in French, sorry) > > Intéressant, peut-etre, mais je parie que Rick ne trouverait pas ce blog > très amusant. > > The example of Patrick Michaels, evil climatologist churning out dubious > reports, would be more surprising if he hadn't been with the Cato Institute. > I mean, everybody already knows those guys are just a mouthpiece for the > far right and the oil lobby, don't they? > > I actually had a serious (though maybe rather dumb) question, regarding the > last part of the blog: What was Philip Cooney's actual impact with regard > to the reports that he allegedly watered down? I mean, who actually sees > the publications produced by the Environmental Quality Council of the > Whitehouse? Was this stuff just being given to Bush (i.e., was this a way > of manipulating the Prez)? Or are their reports widely published and read? > I'm asking because I can't recall anybody ever quoting documents from that > office.
