On Dec 10, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Horace Heffner
That of course assumes the W&L claim that "neutron is thus
absorbed within about ten nanometers" is valid....
As you go on to imply, that particular version is almost certainly
not valid, due to NA, and is probably "undergoing revision" as we
speak ... ;-) but of greater interest would be this:
Is there a version of the broader UCN dynamic, using published
characteristics of the same instead of a tailor-made invention,
which stands up better to criticism and do involve NA ?
This might go back many years. The weight of evidence for helium in
LENR, based on known reactions prior to 1989 together with lack of
~24 MeV gamma - still favors alpha release from Pd via adsorption
of a neutron - and a subthermal neutron and with activation fits
the bill if it will emit no gamma ...
I don't know why a neutron would not act like a neutron.
which is in keeping with the 'virtual neutron' (Russel, 1991;
Dufour, 1993; Kozima and Arai, 2000) and the related hydrex (Dufour
et al., 2001).
Do you have URLs on those?
That would be as an alternative to other theories, or even other
results with no theory - where both helium and NA are witnessed
(via transmutation perhaps) and not forgetting ... of course ...
that tomorrow's version of WL may be different, new & improved, and
so on ... when they realize these old errors are insurmountable,
and make the necessary changes.
Jones
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
