In reply to  Frank's message of Sun, 17 Jan 2010 07:15:25 -0500:
Hi Fran,
[snip]
>Jones  
>
>  Thanks, will start editing today - but still need to address this
>criticism I received from a friend at Sunnyvale, "Remember proof of a
>physical phenomenon has to be correlated with a theoretical physics
>calculation to be accepted then applied.". I think too many people have
>focused their math skills on the hydrogen atom Instead of the Casimir force
>causing the suppression - it is not the relativistic equation of the atom
>that is being effected it is the cavity environment that becomes
>relativistic and the hydrogen simply finds itself reshaped in lower energy
>space. Fewer virtual particles reduces the orbital ground state balance you
>would see in the ZPF (Puthoff) atomic model.. http://byzipp.com/scene6-2.swf
>. There should be a simple math relationship between the Casimir formula and
>ground state orbital diameter.
>
>Fran
[snip]
The energy density of the electrical field of the nucleus is well known. If you
assume that this density changes by a small percentage in the cavity, then there
should be an equivalent small change in the radius. Far too small IMO to explain
anything.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html

Reply via email to