First, let me say that this is meant for all in this list that have used those, or any, derogatory terms or phrases that imply this is a conscious deception by Sean/Steorn...
As I ALREADY stated, a search of the last few weeks, didn't find use of the specific derogatory word 'liar' or 'scammer' written by Terry, but there were at least three others who did use those terms. Terry, who cares if it's a single word or a phrase... It's still unjustified until you have irrefutable proof. In your work with the Sprain affair, from your own admission, you were subject to quite unpleasant treatment which weighed heavily on you... You are walking a fine line, easily crossed, in doing what you yourself were subject to. Those others already crossed it as far as I'm concerned. If this turns out to be what you think it is, a sham, then fire away!!! I'll probably pull the trigger a time or two as well... But that time has not yet come, and there is no clear evidence YET, that Steorn is running a scam. Perhaps they are like Sprain... Sincerely thinking they were on to something novel, but learn the hard way about how mother nature can fool even the best... Time will tell, and soon... I doubt they will survive another failure to prove their claims. Their collective necks are stuck out further than probably anyone on this list ever has done... And I think they know it. For every reason you (all of you) can come up with as to why they must be lying or running a scam, I think I could come up with rational reasons why they are probably sincere... I said sincere, not necessarily right! And as for SJ's comment about what 'credentials' I have that might make my reading of intentions have any weight, I'll also deal with when I have time, but I have probably seen about as much ugly human behavior as most anyone on this list, and have been pressured to 'stretch the truth' to secure 10s of millions in funding... I have NO problem looking myself in the mirror. It all comes down to how would you want others to treat you if you were in their situation? I would think that you would just want people to hold off on any judgements or name calling or derogatory innuendos until you had the chance to prove your claims... *** That's all I am arguing for here *** And it has nothing at all to do with wanting to 'believe'... I'll respond to that nonsense when I have more time. As explained before, I am tired of the claims just as much as any one else.. I've heard them all for 30 years. But I've also seen good, sincere people seriously hurt by such careless, premature speculations. So that's as good as it gets, Terry. If we ever have the good fortune to meet in person, I'll buy the first round! Fair enough? -Mark -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 7:15 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Back EMF: Sean may be right On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Mark Iverson <[email protected]> wrote: > TB: Please cite any post whereby I called them any names. Not one instance of me calling Steorn a name. Yep, lots of derogatory remarks and plenty more to come unless Steorn proves their case. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.730 / Virus Database: 270.14.149/2630 - Release Date: 01/17/10 23:35:00
