>From Mark Iverson ...
> It all comes down to how would you want others to treat you if you were > in their situation? I would think that you would just want people to hold > off on any judgements or name calling or derogatory innuendos until you > had the chance to prove your claims... > *** That's all I am arguing for here *** > > And it has nothing at all to do with wanting to 'believe'... I'll > respond to that nonsense when I have more time. As explained before, > I am tired of the claims just as much as any one else.. I've > heard them all for 30 years. But I've also seen good, sincere people > seriously hurt by such careless, premature speculations. Just to be clear on this point, I do not believe Steorn is a scam operation. I see no reason to change my assumption that they have been sincere in their efforts, even though many have disagreed with the step-by-step approach they have taken. The burning question we all want to know is whether Steorn's ultimate OU claims will turn out to be accurate or not. I don't know how others are handling the suspense, but all I can do is sit back and patiently wait for the next shoe to drop. I don't care if I sound wishy-washy on this point but I am in sympathy with Mark's sentiments, especially with the last sentence. As much as I have on occasion expressed my doubts about Steorn's claims I continue to wish the controversial Irish company good luck, or perhaps I should say: Good Honest Fortunes. (Their good honest fortune, would ultimately translate to my good fortune.) The last thing I want to be feel responsible for having caused, when one looks back through the history books, is having been identified as one of the individuals known to have hindered progress in the smarmy controversial field of outlandish OU claims. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
