Actually it was to Bill, the list owner, quoting: On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:25 PM, William Beaty <[email protected]> wrote:
> Scammers aren't visible because of what they do. If they were, then anyone > could see a con game for what it was. Scammers only become obvious in > what's missing: those things honest people do, but things scammers avoid > doing. > > Has Steorn at any time stated that they have built a simple stand-alone > device which produces energy? Of course not. They would tout a self-runner to high heaven. But, Bill, as Feynman said, the easiest person to fool is yourself. I am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, ie they are laboring under ignorance. Otherwise, there is a chance they will wind up in jail. <end quote> Many are calling them scammers on this list; but, it is not me. I will expect your apology or it will be pistols at dawn, my good sir. Terry On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Mark Iverson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Mark Iverson <[email protected]> wrote: >> So Sean saying that they've already done the calorimetry and determined >> it empirically would not help you one bit --- you would still call them >> liars and scammers! > > I can think of at least two other people that have indeed used those exact > terms to describe > Steorn/Sean, and numerous times, so it was more meant for them... Don't think > you've used these > terms in your posts, but I only went back a few weeks. Although, you seem to > agree with these > individuals in reply to their posts, and don't call them on the use of such > derogatory terms. > > TB: AAMOF I defended against those who do call them scammers. > MI: Really, I couldn't find any, at least not in the last 3 weeks. You have > made comments like > this, "I do certainly hope that he has found something miraculous". I guess > that is supportive... > > TB: Please cite any post on any list whereby Sean says they HAVE performed > calorimetry. Doesn't > exist. > > You misunderstood my statement... It was a hypothetical one. Let me rephrase > it: > "Even if Sean were to say that they've done the calorimetry and determined > the COP to be 3:1, it > would not help you one bit..." > > You wouldn't believe a thing they say at this point, so what good would it do? > > -Mark > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.725 / Virus Database: 270.14.147/2628 - Release Date: 01/16/10 > 23:35:00 > > >
