On 02/01/2010 02:48 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen A. Lawrence > >> Isn't that endothermic? We way past iron here. > > > I tried to make it very clear that this article, which is quoted in the > original posting does not go there - not in any remote way.
Right -- but I was responding to what Abd said: > With a small condensate, and in the BEC state, any fusion could generate > enough energy to disrupt the condensate ... The matter in the condensate > is pure rubidium 85 That juxtaposition of "fusion", "generate energy", and "rubidium 85" doesn't sound right.
