I was really hoping for more comment on the Theory of Little Pops. To me, part of the appeal is this: If one Big Bang can get around such annoying difficulties such as the creation of mass and energy---and (why not?) Spacetime itself----why not endow the "Little Pops" of the Quantum-Flux with the same capacity to create more matter than antimatter??? This is also a good route to explaining a growing Earth. To me the only obstacle to this theory is convincing people that new matter can arise within the Earth. Indeed, if one invokes Relativity's limitation on Mass-Density, one arrives at a minimum Quantum-Flux Wavelength that is close to the Planck-Length, according to Wheeler, (Geometrodynamics 1962) At this point, the smaller wavlengths always give rise to tiny black holes and whiteholes--which Wheeler called wormholes--I'm not sure whether he first created the t. (Which in my mind would go a long ways in explaining the Quasi-Local Nature of Space and Spooky Action at a Distance.) It is quite possible that large, dense gravitational bodies have more white-holes than blackholes with more particulates emerging from them than is disappearing. Hence a Growing Earth. Incidentally, we only have ocean floor data going back up to 200,000,000 years ago. All of our truly ancient fossils come from the Continents, remnants of the Early Sea that did indeed cover most of the Earth at that point! Interestingly, the Continents fit together on a Glob that is about Sixty percent its current size. Apparently, the volume of the Earth was small enough that the crust could stretch, crack and heal up until this point. It is really important to understand that Neal Adams did not assemble the continents on a smaller globe in the manner that one would assemble a puzzle. In one of his videos, he shows how he subtracted ten-million years of the most recent ocean floor formation, shrunk his Virtual Earth which then closed the gaps and did it again and again, in ten-million year increments. This process, naturally, moves the continents together until finally there are no gaps---200,000,000 years ago. Fossilized Flora and Fauna match across these lines, around the World! The GE model of mountain-range growth as a function of the Earth's Crust flattening out as the curvature decreases is a far better explanation for all the high-pressure-formed minerals that are lying around so close the surface in association with these mountain ranges. He makes quite a case for the same process happening on various planets and moons where photographic evidence is available. His video of our Moon is quite striking. Scott
From: scott...@hotmail.com To: Subject: RE: [Vo]:Processed Raney is safer & Event Horizon Terminology Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 08:44:44 -0800 I am not certain if matter can actually leave the “present” or just does a 4D transformation where one spatial dimension trades places with time such that a different inertial frame simply means the “present” is wider or thinner than our frame. This gets into a weakness I have always had regarding velocity and acceleration where some people insist you need “acceleration” to produce time dilation while my take is that you only need a luminal difference in velocity to accumulate dilation. –maybe someone will chip in and explain it to me- I am not sure that this makes any difference since a different speed always represents a certain amount of acceleration between the frames. · Likewise, when the catalyzed reactants emerge from the cavity, they are not · emerging from our future---if they are then you and I have got to send · ourselves the lottery numbers from fifteen minutes in the future---how about · it??? (I actually tried a similar thing with the Electron Einstein-Bose · Condensate inside a superconductor disk, positing that the condensate locked in · the electron zombie state over time as well as over physical distance---no · results yet!!!) See articles about Professor Ron Mallet http://www.physorg.com/news63371210.html who intends just that using powerful circulating laser beams. He hopes to receive messages from the future when they turn on their prototype. I have written him without reply and have considered exactly the scenario you describe but even looping a transmission while inside the other inertial frame or between frames still undergoes a translation every transmission between frames. I have also had trouble getting him to respond---my recommendation to him was to cause a circular shadow inside the beam, thus creating a perfect, continuous tube of light. Is any one set up to try such a thing? Scott Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now. _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469228/direct/01/
