2010/3/31 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]>: > Sent from my iPhone
Not a valid excuse ;-) > On Mar 31, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Michel Jullian <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In fact, I was wondering, who cares about the heat, helium production >> alone is an indisputable proof of LENRs, isn't it? > > A familiarity with the history of the dispute, and even of very recent > comments here about this, would reveal how incorrect this is. My comment had nothing to do with the dispute, thanks for your description of it though. I was just stating the obvious: if there is He *production* in a low energy environment, then obviously there are LENRs. ... > Helium is difficult to measure. It will diffuse through glass. The levels > are very low and in most results, are below ambient. It is very easy to > remain skeptical on helium measurements alone. ... > But when the helium findings > correlate with excess heat, it all changes. The results confirm each other. Too much proof makes people doubt. What we need is an indisputable proof of He production. All right it leaks through glass, so how about a closed cell kept under positive pressure? Surely, after a few days it would accumulate a sizable amount of He, which couldn't possibly come from the atmosphere because of the positive pressure. Michel
