On 03/31/2010 02:11 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 31, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Michel Jullian <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In fact, I was wondering, who cares about the heat, helium production >> alone is an indisputable proof of LENRs, isn't it? >>> >>> >>> > > A familiarity with the history of the dispute, and even of very recent > comments here about this, would reveal how incorrect this is.
If helium production is correlated with heat -- which it is -- then it really doesn't matter what the ratio between them is, nor does it matter how large the signal is. It's inexplicable by chemical means. I took that to be what Michel was referring to, rather than the simple fact that helium sometimes appears.
