In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 19 Nov 2010 14:43:23 -0800: Hi, [snip] >http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Rossi-Focardi_paper.pdf
Quote: "During experimental tests, continuous controls on the radioactivity levels in close proximity to the apparatus suitably lead shielded, were performed by using a gamma ray detector [6] and three passive neutron bubble detectors BTbubble [7], one of which for thermal neutrons: no radiation was observed at levels greater than natural radiation background. No radioactivity has been found also in the Nickel residual from the process." ....yet in the body of the paper they discuss extensively a number of nuclear reactions which would produce copious gamma rays. They would appear to have experimentally disproved their own theory. Furthermore, a pure Mills reaction creating Hydrinos, with no nuclear reactions at all would easily account for the energy release, while also explaining the lack of ionizing radiation. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
