I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Are you saying that gravity behaves in the "traditional" (Newtonian) way inside solid bodies? Do you have links or papers to experiments that support this? As I said, there are reported anomalies inside boreholes. How do you or others explain them?
Take into account that although gravity can be related to mass and density, that is, it can have a dependency on mass and density, that does not mean mass and density are the causes of gravity. Indeed, it makes a lot of sense to think just the opposite: that which "causes" mass (or the effects of mass) has to be massless in itself, to avoid a circular argument. The cause of gravity must be immune to the effects of gravity, by the very definition of cause. On 11/27/2010 08:45 AM, David Jonsson wrote: > Sorry, if the integration is done with higher precision it turns out > to be the traditional one. > > But it is still useful for determining the gravity from other > geometries. I think it is bad that bodies are approximated with point > sources in their "center of gravity". > > David > > >
