In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Sat, 08 Jan 2011 08:51:44 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Robin, >Yes, gas atoms do see themselves as totally normal inside the cavity, and time >is accelerated by an enormous factor inversely proportional to the cube of the >spacing between Casimir plates which act as a reservoir.
Where do you get this equation? >The difficulty is our macro concept of equivalent acceleration may be hiding >the scope of these forces at the smallest scales where time and space can >transform with changes in energy density. The video by Jon Philips we >discussed previously: http://www.youtube.com/user/audrip you replied >that[snip]..so this guy has proven that he can read and understand Mills. ;) >The bit about >infinite electric fields is straight out of Mills. Regards,[/snip] .... Which >I don't disagree with but in addition to his rehash, he also elaborates on how >these opposing infinite fields overlap and mostly cancel out except for the >very local space time between the physical matter associated with these >infinite fields. That's infinite in extent, not strength. Mills doesn't claim the fields are any stronger (even locally) than given by the usual equations. >What we see at the macro scale may only represent a small shadow of these >forces after they cancel and average to a tiny bias we describe as >gravity/equivalent acceleration. My point being that accelerations, although >negative, might be on a scale we normally associate with black holes and have >time dilations up to the 1E80 to 1E100 year challenge of tunneling. As for >slowing or accelerating we aren't talking spatial acceleration but rather >equivalent acceleration contributed by the plates and that acceleration is >negative forming a gravity hill vs a gravity well. If we outside the cavity >are the reference point then we would appear to be accelerated to near luminal >velocity relative to the hydrogen inside the cavity. It ages greatly from our >perspective but instead of us returning from a spaceship to earth, it is the >hydrogen returning to our inertial frame from a negative equivalent >acceleration inside the cavity - I won't say deceleration because we tend to >think of deep space as the zero reference and the cavity is using the >reservoir to create a venturi negative to that reference. > >Regards >Fran [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
