In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:50:49 -0800: Hi, [snip]
1/3 of 300 gm of Ni = 100 gm of copper ~= 1.6 Mol * 150 MeV / Th fission reaction => 6.3E6 kWh of thermal power = 126 times more than 50000 kWh. One has to wonder where it all went to. (Not to mention that Th fission would likely create lots of different radioisotopes, besides a small amount of Cu). >... two more details worth mentioning about "seeding" in LENR, such as with >a radioactive isotope, only this time it is not an exotic isotope. And that >infamous Bologna reactor, shaped like the boot of Italy, is starting to >really smoke, now. > >The secret could be thorium. The second confirming detail for this is >Rossi's transmuted copper. As it turns out, the transmutation of >thorium-to-copper, specifically, has been oft reported in the history of >LENR going back 15 years... ergo, in a situation where there is nickel >seeded with thorium, the copper that shows up may come from the thorium. >That would be the Rossi/Cincinnati/Celani connection. > >Obviously Rossi would not want to admit that thorium was present in the >first place, if it turns out to be the secret catalyst. And it would explain >a number of other troubling details in this unfolding mystery, as well. > >Recently, Nick mentioned the Cincinnati group, from the mid-1990s - where >thorium was transmuted rapidly to other elements, and a major end-product >was said to be copper. And there is this, with a similar claim of *visual >levels* of copper from transmutation (as was Rossi's claim = visual levels): > >http://www.lightparty.com/Energy/TransmutationNuclearWaste.html > >Also worth mentioning - Lewis Larsen is now on the thorium LENR bandwagon, > >http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/thoriumseed-lenr-networkfigslattice-e >nergydec-7-2010-6177745 > >Lots of coincidences here. Not the least of which is this - from Celani no >less! > >http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:1qybllxuy_QJ:lss.fnal.gov/archive/ >other/lnf-98-019-p.pdf+cincinnati+thorium+transmutation+copper&hl=en&gl=us&p >id=bl&srcid=ADGEESg-RjXcYVaL4W9ZX1mRFvc1FBFIQgVjc5tf6iC5ORVOxMhMZUcTUYLTNEda >7GrLRhw0SI5RwQf3cQKrbj6lKlRwp3ZX_7rVq4H_ocmxKiDpKKkcNWE79gCvwg2zKrCRku7yC53e >&sig=AHIEtbTGJvvnMSbJh0nwaiomIUqo5STNTQ >Had Rossi been using thorium as his secret catalyst, he would have surely >known of Celani's connection via this article above. In fact, it may have >been his inspiration for trying it. Years later, at the demo in Bologna, he >would have guessed that Celani probably suspected thorium was present, and >had his meter calibrated to find it ! Thus - Rossi stopped only Celani, when >at least two other meters were looking for other kinds of emissions that he >did not care about ! > >Jones > >BTW A previous stab at verbalizing probability enhancement was: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg39553.html > > >-----Original Message----- > >. The purpose of the radioactive "seed" emitter in this >scenario is NOT to produce power, per se. It is to alter the QM probability >field. > Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
