It is a little unclear whether there will soon be a report on this 18-hour test. It may take a while. I have contacted some the people involved. They did say that if they write a report in English, they will let me have a few hours to fix the English before publishing it. That would help reduce confusion. I work mainly as a copy editor, fixing the English, punctuation and so on, but I do sometimes get a word in edgewise, suggesting to authors that they clarify a point or add some information.

I think the first test was better than people realize, but the presentation was poor because the authors do not speak English well. As I told them, I sympathize. I have trouble writing reports in Japanese. (By the way, I sometimes have a back channel means of figuring out what Celani is up to. His English is hard to understand because he talks so much. I ask his wife Misa what he means. She's Japanese. She has some hilarious things to say about life in Italy. She should write a book.)

The test took place at U. Bologna. On Rossi's web page they said earlier that tests would continue there, and by gum they did.

I do not know if they are aware of the critiques here and elsewhere, but anyway, it seems they are now doing liquid flow calorimetry rather than phase-change calorimetry. I guess they heard directly from Celani when he was there. He strongly advocated that. It is just a matter of speeding up the flow rate.

I myself did not think the phase change (boiling) calorimetry was a big deal. I discount some of the criticism of it. However, it is always a good idea to use a second or third method to measure the same phenomenon. Suspenders and a belt! So I am pleased they did this. It would be good to use an IR sensor to estimate how much heat the device itself is radiating.

This report says 15 kW. My guess, or gut feeling, is that by increasing the flow they recovered more heat, losing less to radiation from the gadget. It was probably producing 15 kW in the first test too. The gadget does not look optimized to capture heat.

- Jed

Reply via email to