Isn't it more likely that the skeptics simply think the field is a joke, rather than that they're intimidated by the weight of the positive evidence?
Sent from my iPhone. On Feb 24, 2011, at 10:52, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]> wrote: > At 01:30 AM 2/24/2011, you wrote: >> Not being able to concede a point is a clear sign of someone >> with an ulterior motive, or a pathological skeptic who simply can't accept >> things which challenge >> their understanding of things. Not surprising... He reminds me of some of >> the worst editors on >> Wikipedia! > > Yeah, one in particular who happens to be named Joshua. However, the style, > the tone and emphasis was different, so I think it's unlikely. Or the Joshua > I know has matured some. > > None of these "skeptics" can manage to get up a published review? Is Shanahan > with his Letter responding to Krivit and Marwan in the Journal of > Environmental Monitoring the best they can manage? > >
