Doing nothing regarding the storage pools could be an incredibly bad suggestion, though it may be the only option if serious radiation leaks begin to occur and evacuation is necessary. What to do depends on whether neutron absorber slabs were actually placed between *all* fuel assembly storage positions. It is my recollection that storage pools did not have neutron absorber slabs when originally constructed decades ago because there was no intent to store for long periods. Separation geometry alone was used to prevent criticality. When storage pools began to run out of room, the unused portions of storage pools were later modified to accommodate closer storage by adding neutron absorber slabs between fuel assemblies, and storing them closer together.

If the neutron absorbers used can burn, decompose or rubblize at lower temperatures than the fuel rod assemblies, then even they may not prevent criticality in the volumes in which they exist, because they will not still be located appropriately in the rubble. If there are volumes where do not exist then it is essential to fill those volumes with a solid which will prevent critical mass, either by preserving the geometry or by absorbing neutrons.

One key thing to do immediately is to situate a number of neutron counters in the vicinity of each pool. This could be done by lowering an asbestos insulated cable with one or more neutron counters on it through the roof by crane, or to lower through the roof a water cooled metal pipe with neutron counters located within it.

Time is of the essence. Putting water on the storage pools seems to have provided some calm for a while, just no permanent solution.

It seems possible to use a crane (one is on site, but maybe not big enough) to lift a fire hose or cement hose with a steel pipe on the end up over the top of the building structure and to lower the pipe down into the building at the spent fuel pool location, which is right under the roof. It should then be possible to pump a coolant into the cooling pond through the hose and pipe.

For a reactor with the roof intact, a shaped charge should be sufficient to blow a sufficient sized hole in the roof.

One idea for a coolant is to use a boron carbide pellet with water (or boric acid) slurry. That way, if the water evaporates, the boron carbide remains to reduce the degree of criticality. If there is sufficient boron carbide then water loss may actually further reduce the degree of criticality, though the temperature would rise and the fuel rod cladding may oxidize. Still, when a rubble pile forms, it will be full of boron carbide, which can withstand very high temperatures, and prevent criticality, eliminating the china syndrome possibility.

It may be feasible to use a cement pumper truck to pump such a slurry.

The main problem with this idea may be locating the tons of boron carbide pellets needed. Boron carbide should be around a many forms, including the form of industrial abrasives. A mix of boron carbide powders, granules and pellets in a slurry may be very effective due to the high packing coefficient, but might eliminate any prospect of water cooling.

Another problem could be that there is a big crack or hole that is letting the water out. If the crack is too big, then the pellets should leak out also. However, enough might remain inside to be effective for most of the fuel rods, especially if the pellets etc. sinter together in the process.

Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/




Reply via email to