>Do you think the professors suddenly become criminals when they drive a few >kilometers from the campus? Or do you think they suddenly become very stupid >and unable to do experiments?
I think that the Dept. of Physics have a LOT of professor and researchers. Because a single-phase calorimetric test is so easy and because they (dept. of physics) will instantly become internationally famous if they certificate "a new cheap energy source" they WILL NOT put probes inside reactors, they WILL NOT lost data. It's simple, Jed. A "certification" from an *University* is MUCH MORE VALUABLE then a "certification" from an university researcher. And it's MUCH MORE DANGEROUS if the "certification" is not well-done. From: Jed Rothwell Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 3:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi can commit fraud as easily at the University as off campus Andrea Selva <[email protected]> wrote: What possible difference can the physical location of the experiment make?!? The laws of physics are uniform throughout the universe and also off-campus. Oh, just that the testers could pretend to see what's getting out of the exit pipe instead of simply flushing it in the toilet .... or pretending to measure the output temperature placing the probe at the very output of the reactor instead of sticking it in a anonymous hole in the middle of the vertical arm of the big aluminium foil wrapping ... or recording on a suitable media the collected data instead of loose them and showing PC screenies taken by a compact camera ... The testers are professors from the university. Why would they be more likely to commit fraud at a site off campus rather than on-campus? What would stop them from committing fraud in the laboratory on campus? I do not understand what you are getting at. Do you think the professors suddenly become criminals when they drive a few kilometers from the campus? Or do you think they suddenly become very stupid and unable to do experiments? Just few and negligible details that couldn't for sure have affected the claimed results .... The details you list are not "negligible" at all! They are huge. Anyone performing this experiment would know better than to use "an anonymous hole" in the arm. If the person doing the experiment was so stupid he would do this, he would be just as likely to do it on campus as off campus. Being inside the university gates does not automatically make a person less likely to make a stupid mistake. - Jed
