Andrea Selva <[email protected]> wrote: Jed, I don't understand if you ever saw any of the pictures of the two test > assets or any of the clips of the January one. > If your answer is yes maybe your eyes are note telling you the truth. > Everybody can easily see that the output probe (the one attached to the > data recorder) is stick in the "anonymous hole" right in the middle of the > vertical arm. >
As you see in the latest photos, when you look inside the arm you can see the T-connector with the thermocouple in it. I was told by one of the observers this is the case. > The scenario can be very simpler that the funny one you described. > What there is near/around this anonymous hole hidden under the foil layers > ? > A T connector ? (Maybe with a little help of a small electrical heater ?) > A small electrical heater could never make the water boil or outlet hose too hot to touch. It could, of course, fool the thermocouple if the thermocouple probe was placed inside the heater instead of in the flow of water. I did think of that. But the water coming out of the machine would be lukewarm in the first test. It would not boil and the hose would not be too hot to touch, even if all of the electric power going into the device was transfered to the water. > Does Rossi unwrapped the "big salami" in front of the testers to show the > interior in that point ? > Yes, he did. And he did again in the third test, as you see. Perhaps Levi has not been so naive and checked the Tout [outlet temperature] > elsewhere, but this doesn't appear in any report. > He, Dufour and others checked Tout elsewhere by feeling the outlet pipe, as I reported here. That's what they told me. If they had not told me that, I might have shared some of your suspicions. - Jed
