On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wrote: > > >> I mean that no sane person would simply insert a probe into a hole without >> checking where the probe ended up, and also checking to be sure it is >> properly positioned and leak-tight. You don't just "insert" a thermocouple, >> you loosen up the T connector, slide it in, and tighten the connector again. > > > What I am trying to explain here, is that the "anonymous hole" scenario is > ludicrous. Levi explained the "prudential" steps he to look for possible > fraud. Are we to suppose he did not realize you have to check where the > temperature probe goes to? It is a comedy scene something like this: > > Jed, I don't understand if you ever saw any of the pictures of the two test assets or any of the clips of the January one. If your answer is yes maybe your eyes are note telling you the truth. Everybody can easily see that the output probe (the one attached to the data recorder) is stick in the "anonymous hole" right in the middle of the vertical arm. The scenario can be very simpler that the funny one you described. What there is near/around this anonymous hole hidden under the foil layers ? A T connector ? (Maybe with a little help of a small electrical heater ?) Does Rossi unwrapped the "big salami" in front of the testers to show the interior in that point ? Perhaps Levi has not been so naive and checked the Tout elsewhere, but this doesn't appear in any report.
