Alan J Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote:
> I believe they "had access" to the external lead shielding. It only takes a > moment to remove it. In their report, they said: > "We had free access to the heater electric supply, to the inlet water hose, > to the outlet steam valve and water hose, and to the hydrogen gas feed > pipe." > That covers everything but the inner sancta sanctorum cell. > > > > What part of NO INFORMATION did I misinterpret? > You misinterpret "information" to mean "access" or "sight of." They say they had free access to the inlet water hose and so on. Look at the photo of the device. The components on that list includes everything but 50 ml inner cell. So your analysis should assume that hidden fuel has to fit into that 50 ml. They had free access to everything else. They say they have no "information" on two things: the lead shield, and the cooling water system. The cooling water system is hidden in there with the cell, under that copper bulge. It is the heat exchanger. "Information" on the lead shield would be, I suppose, the mass of it or the purpose of it. Even if we assume the shield was not removed, I can see practically everything in Fig. 2 with the lead shield in place. I can estimate the thickness of the insulation. And Fig. 4 shows the whole thing with the shielding removed. So I not see what you are talking about. I refer to the figures here: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/EssenHexperiment.pdf - Jed
