Mills told us years ago that his catalyst is potassium. Why do we think this is a different process? Remember that Mills started this work with a nickel-hydrogen fuel cell. If it's real, then more than likely it's the same process.
Craig On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 21:47 +0300, Peter Gluck wrote: > Why not bet on what the catalyst is? > > > My guess is this (it is valid only in Italian) > The catalyst is Nickel electro- Nitrogen Telluride, > shortened name NieNTe - niente- i.e. nothing > Just a very good method of activation. I have told > this here three days ago and I am ready to bet. > > > Peter > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:34 PM, noone noone > <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Over the past few months I have read many guesses as to what > the catalyst(s) might be. > > A couple speculations are sodium hydride and zirconium. > > Please use this thread to post your speculations as to the > catalysts used in the E-Cat. > > If we can figure this out replication work can happen far > sooner than when Rossi's catalyst patent is granted (which > could be a long time). > > Anyone have any ideas they would like to share? > > All we know from Rossi is that... > > 1) The catalyst is not copper. > 2) The catalyst is not iron. > 3) The catalyst is not a precious metal. > 4) The catalyst is not radioactive. > 5) The catalyst is not expensive. > 6) The catalyst is not Raney Nickel > 7) The catalyst is not an additional gas placed in the > reactor. > > What can we come up with from these clues? > > > > > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > >
