In reply to [email protected]'s message of Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:26:35 +1000: Hi, [snip]
I should add that x-rays resulting from these electrons could easily lie in this range. >In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Wed, 13 Apr 2011 >16:30:59 -0500: >Hi, >[snip] >>From Mark: >> >>> Rossi: No radioactivity has been found in the residual metals, it is true, >>> but the day after the stop of the operation. In any case you are right, if >>> 59-Cu is formed from 58-Ni we should have the couples of 511 keV at 180° and >>> we never found them, while we found keV in the range of 100-300 keV. >> >>Is the 100 - 300 KeV range within the speculated reality rage of >>hydrino formation? >> >>Just curious. > >Not from direct Hydrino reactions, however a fusion initiated by a Hydrino may >result in fast electrons which could easily have this much energy (and in fact >much more). Note that by the time the fast electron gets out of the device to >the detector it will usually have lost a considerable amount of energy through >collisions. > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
