Jed Rothwell wrote: > >>Harry Veeder wrote: >> >> >>I think it is a great way to fake it. >Okay, what insulator would you use inside the pipe? You need something thin >enough to allow the water through and yet effective at 1 L/s with a 31°C >temperature difference for the apparent 130 kW heat in the Feb. 10 test. >
I don't know. Probably with the given exhaust tube it would not be possible. However, I find this tube-within-a-tube-scheme to be more devious than a concealed source of power. Harry >Why wouldn't Levi et al. notice that they cannot insert the thermocouples more >than a faction of the way into the hose? (If they could insert it and it did >not > >penetrate the barrier, it would block the middle channel.)
