Axil, please continue posting, your comments are appreciated. 

As I understand, this forum exists only for sharing information and ideas; 
personal comments should not be posted nor ever considered.
Jay Caplan
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Axil Axil 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 5:28 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:About isotopic ratio on spent fuel (E-Cat)


  I am a systems engineer who has spent his career reverse engineering legacy 
systems where no documentation or human expertise exists.

  I have development an interest in cold fusion and am learning its ground 
rules. I have come to this site to learn from the experts... the best around.

  If I pursue wrong paths, I do not mean to offend, however, if my learning 
process offends  too grievously, I will leave this site. So let me know is I am 
too much for you to bear in your response. 




  On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

    Wow. I can see that science is a completely new field for you. 



    Your take on this paper is bizarre and so removed from reality that I have 
to ask – what is your real profession?



    This report is about magic numbers, which are tendencies. There is 
absolutely nothing in this that supports this brain-dead idea of uniformity in 
isotopes in cosmology. Sure, there are tendencies but they as so weak that 
order-of-magnitude differences are the norm – not the exception.



    Geeze … we used to be able to have intelligent discussions here.



    Jones









    From: Axil 



    Here is the theory that you are rejecting laid out in detail from Miley



    
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWS&PROFESSORS/pdf/MagicQuarkTucson1.pdf

    "Boltzmann Equilibrium of Endothermic Heavy Nuclear Synthesis in the 
Universe and a Quark Relation to the Magic Numbers "



    It is not Axil's theory, but one produced by Mille that I think most fits 
the facts.





    On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

    Fran,



    Ø  Harry, I think it is more a matter of proving how the Casimir 
environment is equivalent to the stellar environment. 



    Which stellar environment? 




Reply via email to