Axil - My apologies.

 

I was a bit frustrated at what seems to be "beating a dead horse" with this
particular point  .

 

You have already demonstrated a creative mind, and the Mott insulator thing
could be a strong insight.

 

Again, sorry to go overboard there .

 

Jones

 

My double apology to any who has to deal with legacy systems :-)

 

 

 

From: Axil Axil 

 

I am a systems engineer who has spent his career reverse engineering legacy
systems where no documentation or human expertise exists.

I have development an interest in cold fusion and am learning its ground
rules. I have come to this site to learn from the experts... the best
around.

If I pursue wrong paths, I do not mean to offend, however, if my learning
process offends  too grievously, I will leave this site. So let me know is I
am too much for you to bear in your response. 

 

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

Wow. I can see that science is a completely new field for you. 

 

Your take on this paper is bizarre and so removed from reality that I have
to ask - what is your real profession?

 

This report is about magic numbers, which are tendencies. There is
absolutely nothing in this that supports this brain-dead idea of uniformity
in isotopes in cosmology. Sure, there are tendencies but they as so weak
that order-of-magnitude differences are the norm - not the exception.

 

Geeze . we used to be able to have intelligent discussions here.

 

Jones

 

 

 

 

From: Axil 

 

Here is the theory that you are rejecting laid out in detail from Miley

 

http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWS
<http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWS&PROFESSORS/pdf/MagicQuar
kTucson1.pdf> &PROFESSORS/pdf/MagicQuarkTucson1.pdf

"Boltzmann Equilibrium of Endothermic Heavy Nuclear Synthesis in the
Universe and a Quark Relation to the Magic Numbers "

 

It is not Axil's theory, but one produced by Mille that I think most fits
the facts.

 

 

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

Fran,

 

*  Harry, I think it is more a matter of proving how the Casimir environment
is equivalent to the stellar environment. 

 

Which stellar environment? 

 

 

Reply via email to