I understand your need to refer to every single thing that Sterling Allan has done over the years. Yes, pushing Mylow was a mistake. Yes, I'd be happy if he never mentioned biblecodes, MIB or conspiracy theories. He sometimes does that, so I switch to the next article. I only really follow PESN/PESWiki when it's related to something I'm interested in. Just like some of you completely zone out when some people post on Vortex-List.
However, PESWiki is not edited only by Sterling Allan, and in the case of Rossi's Answers to PESWiki, and the worthwhileness of it, should instead be judged by the content on Andrea Rossi that is already available on PESWiki. In this case I'd refer to the E-CAT FAQ, which has been compiled by Hank Mills. http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Andrea_Rossi's_Cold_Fusion_Energy_Catalyzer_(E-Cat):_Frequently_Asked_Questions So the question I pose is this: Is this woo-woo and completely nutty, unreasonable and laughable? We can all sit around pointing fingers at everyone, until the FE community is a bunch of couchpotatoes who would all like to start their own stuff, "because Jerry Decker did this" and "John Bedini said that" and "I don't like Tom Bearden's moustache" and "Sterling Allan goes off about earthchanges" and so on, but that's just a handy way of paralyzing ourselves. If nothing else, by merit of having the E-CAT FAQ, it'd be decent for PESWiki to at least have a mirror of the Rossi Answers, as it's useful data. Let's see how long it takes for anyone else to set up a wiki accessible by non-flash communication devices. On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Angela Kemmler <angela.kemm...@gmx.de>wrote: > citation: > > > BTW, is this not a good place to set one up at? > > http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Andrea_Rossi's_Cold_Fusion_Energy_Catalyzer_(E-Cat):_Frequently_Asked_Questions > > PESN has clearly commercial interests, and our discussions of the > Rossi-principle have nothing to do with business. Further, they (PESN) talk > on their webpages about so called "scalar waves", consipracy theories and > other pseudoscience: > > ...We seek to bring knowledge of suppressed technologies into more > conventional arenas ... > > Nobody "supresses" Rossi, even the italian television RAI3 talked about > him, there are three Wikipedia articles about the Ecat and the university of > Uppsala will perhaps test his device later this week. > > *** > > I installed sucessfully three times the Wikimedia software, that wikipedia > uses. It takes about one or two hours to install it and it is free. And a > domain costs here in Germany about 50 ct / month, in the USA perhaps even > less. > > So, it seems for me to be the better choice than a ads-encircled > environment like a PESN - page. There is enough ads in the internet ! > > Angela > -- > NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen! > Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone > >
