Rossi has specifically stated that one or two other elements are used as catalysts with the nickel powder.
So while it is possible there is not a "spill over catalyst" there is some type of catalyst mixed in with the nickel. The truth cannot be that he has lied repeatedly to the world on his blog, lied to Focardi and other associates repeatedly, and there is no catalyst at all. If (and I do not think this is the case) the heater is the only thing responsible for the reaction and he has lied about the catalysts I hope his technology goes no where. I do not have pity for liars, but I do not think he is lying. I think he is telling the truth. ________________________________ From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, April 30, 2011 5:23:46 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Old, but MAJOR clue about the Rossi CATALYST? As I stated before in the Cat-E patent, Rossi ash contains no element heavier the zinc. Rossi has stated that he does not use precious metals in the Cat-E. The logical conclusion is that that there is no spill over catalyst mixed in with the nickel catalyst. The source of hydrogen ionization works at a distance from the surface of the nickel powder. The internal heater can generate a 1000 times more H- ions that any spill over catalyst element could possible produce. This internal heater is capable of ionizing the entire volume of the hydrogen if required. On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Akira Shirakawa <[email protected]> wrote: On 2011-05-01 01:34, Jones Beene wrote: > >[...] > > >Even so, it is very likely that the Rossi breakthrough is a spillover catalyst >that gives far more than the 10x the effect of Arata/Zhang. >> Interesting, thanks very much for the info. So in the end Rossi didn't really reveal anything special, since in short that is what Arata-Zhang already discovered, although at a much lower yield apparently. > >However that is probably, as you say, his breakthrough (or most of it), and >that's where research should go. > >Cheers, >S.A. > >
