Rossi has specifically said that a couple of elements are used as catalysts. If what you are saying is true (and I do not believe it is) it would make him a total lying scum-bag. Of course, I don't think he is lying and he is telling us the truth.
Also, the fact the system can self sustain without an input for extended periods of time (and can actually be difficult to stop) tells me the heaters are not the catalysts. ________________________________ From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, April 30, 2011 6:03:06 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Old, but MAJOR clue about the Rossi CATALYST? Rossi would never give the nickel catalyst to anyone if the “secret” could be chemically deduced from the nickel powder. The “secret” is not associated with the nickel powder. Rossi said: “I understand you get fun, we don’t: we work on this in a factory totally dedicated to this, and we are pretty good at, as you soon will see. In our team there are Nuclear Physics University professors, with experience from CERN of Geneva, INFN, etc., etc.” Workers at CERN are expert at producing hydrogen IONs (protons) to fill the CERN acceleration ring. Producing ionized hydrogen (plasma) and accelerating these protons are what atoms smashers are all about. Rossi ionizes hydrogen using current from the PLCs in his control box. Varying the voltage of this current to his internal heater is how he controls his reactor. On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Akira Shirakawa <[email protected]> wrote: On 2011-05-01 02:23, Axil Axil wrote: > >As I stated before in the Cat-E patent, Rossi ash contains no element >>heavier the zinc. Rossi has stated that he does not use precious metals >>in the Cat-E. >> Do you think the patent can be trusted? After all it's written in the least useful possible way (prominent example: reactor temperature range of 150-5000 degrees C). There's also microscope photography of the ash, which shows particles in the micron range in size. As nanoparticles are easy to come by, and that according to Arata decreasing particle size to the nanometers range increases the likelihood of reaction, wouldn't it be wise for Rossi to use them instead (unless there is a very specific reason to use particles in the micron range)? I bet he already does. > >The point of this being: that patent is probably outdated or deliberately >incomplete, and might lack fundamental information to obtain the huge excess >heat reported. > >Cheers, >S.A. > > > >
