Mattia, Yes, but were either Villa or Bianchini setup to test along the axial vector (of the horizontal arm), and were they allowed to test at startup?
A hypothetical photon beam, if it was the source that Celani saw, would be detectable only in that narrow beam emission vector - and nowhere else. > Jones, neither Villa nor Bianchini, with professional & calibrated equipment, detected a burst in gamma radiation. Celani instruments were away from e-cat (and we don't know if he used a professional & calibrated detectors). -------------------------------------------------- From: "Jones Beene" Subject: RE: [Vo]:Old, but MAJOR clue about the Rossi CATALYST? >> But Rossi did allow what Levi said was a positron detector during > operation... Apparently they expected to see positron annihilation. > > > One note on this, set against the reported Celani "rad-burst anecdote" at > the demo in Bologna: > > If you remember the Celani story, both of his rad-meters got pegged before > the demo, when a group was waiting to go in - from another room, and this > burst coincided with the reactor startup ... OK - the best explanation so > far was a coincidental cosmic ray burst... as odd as it sounds - here is > the > thread if you don't remember the incident: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg42665.html > > For the record, there is one possibility that may not have been mentioned > before, involving positron annihilation - which can explain this. Of > course, > a coincidental cosmic ray burst cannot be ruled out, but we can weigh the > various probabilities of that happenstance against what will be suggested > below. > > The evidence which we need to know would be this: was Celani standing in > alignment with the axis of horizontal arm of the E-Cat (in the other room) > so that a directed beam from the axis of the E-Cat would have been aimed > directly at him? If not, then disregard what follows. > > If he was positioned in axial alignment, even 10 meters away and behind a > wall or door - then we can suggest that positron annihilation could have > been involved in a situation where an axial magnetic field (caused by the > high amp heaters) would have aligned reactants for a directed beam. > > Positron emission can occur with reactants that would have been used by > Rossi, including 40K. Most importantly, hydrogen fusing into deuterium > release a positron. A photon beam, as compared with a spherical burst > could > be thousands of times more intense in that axial vector only. A similar > thing happens in Cosmology when quasars emit in narrow beams. > > Many observers are trying to weave the M.O. of the Rossi effect into the > Dirac "sea of negative energy" scenario and Don Hotson's epo > interpretation > of same. This beam scenario would fit into that - and the best part is > that > positron annihilation happens with two gammas going in opposite > directions, > so some kind of solenoid magnetic field in the reactor could have focused > an > intense beam of 512 keV gammas out of either end at startup. This also > explains why Levi's positron detector was not picking up anything. As you > can see in the video, the detector head is positioned orthogonal to the > axis, and the hypothetical beam, if it exists - would be axial... > > Now, I have to ask again - where was Celani standing, relative to the axis > of the reactor on startup? That could be the MAJOR clue that the subject > heading promises. > > Jones > > > > > >
