-----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton > That is not the conclusion of the experts.
How often have the experts been wrong regarding LENR? Touché ... However, V&B look to be very qualified in gamma measurement, and they take into account the shielding, and most of all, they do not deny the excess heat... which they witnessed firsthand. Therefore, the real question resolves to this: what good reason is there to "want it to be nuclear" ? Answer: none. Would we all not be better off in every possible way if the reaction were both gainful and non-nuclear? A nuclear process, as we all agree - gets the NRC and if for that reason alone it can be called non-nuclear then why rock the boat?
