I agree. But my math give me around 1.8/1.9 liter per seconds. (depending if you use 1600 or 1700 times multiplier).
From: Andrea Selva Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 2:27 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:New tests- by Nyteknyk With a 4,1 Liter per hour of input water I calculated that the output flow of the steam should be around 5,4 Liter per second. (Dry steam volume increase of 1700 times) Observing the video, the output of black hose looks like a shiny baby fart instead of a robust steam flow. IMHO A 1KW vapor steam cleaner make a more ecffective job 2011/5/2 Jeff Driscoll <[email protected]> So they are again using a crappy temperature probe to figure out steam quality (dry versus wet steam)? This is so bogus. If the boiling water has a back pressure of 0.6 psi, the temperature will be raised by 1 degree C see here: http://www.broadleyjames.com/FAQ-text/102-faq.html Is this the third time they have done this stupid method of measuring evaporation of steam? Or is more than 3 times. Does anyone have the correct count of times they have done this? Why don't they feed the steam into a 55 gallon water tank and then measure the temperature rise of the water as *everyone* has been suggesting? They probably don't and won't because they are frauds. On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: see please: http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3166552.ece Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
