How about no need? They can easily examine the steam quality where the tubing is attached. It's strait forward to tell if it's wet steam or dry steam. If it's dry steam, there is no need to do the 55 gallon water tank test.
________________________________ From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 6:17:36 AM Subject: RE: [Vo]:New tests- by Nyteknyk What would you prefer? completely incompetent? Jeff is right-on. Once again, with feeling: “Why don't they feed the steam into a 55 gallon water tank and then measure the temperature rise of the water as *everyone* has been suggesting?” Jones From:noone noone Be careful with the fraud word. You may have to live with those words forever, after the E-Cat technology starts being used all around the world. ________________________________ From:Jeff Driscoll < So they are again using a crappy temperature probe to figure out steam quality (dry versus wet steam)? This is so bogus. If the boiling water has a back pressure of 0.6 psi, the temperature will be raised by 1 degree C see here: http://www.broadleyjames.com/FAQ-text/102-faq.html Is this the third time they have done this stupid method of measuring evaporation of steam? Or is more than 3 times. Does anyone have the correct count of times they have done this? Why don't they feed the steam into a 55 gallon water tank and then measure the temperature rise of the water as *everyone* has been suggesting? They probably don't and won't because they are frauds. On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: see please: > >http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3166552.ece > >Peter > >-- >Dr. Peter Gluck >Cluj, Romania >http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/ >
