see please:
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3166552.ece
I've collected the following responses by Mats Lewan (Google-translate has a limit, so I've done them one at a time).
Response to Martin O
Oops, that was very unclear what I'm talking! I say this (3:05):
"The temperature is over 100 degrees centigrade ... so we Clearly Have steam. Here's the outlet hose, We Can see vapor coming out ...".
Mats Lewan, New Technology Tuesday, 15:16
- - - -
Response to Per
There will be a version dubbed into English by the end of the week, according to RAI.
Mats Lewan, New Technology May 3, 2011 23:40
- - - -
Response to Mr Lindberg
Resistor 1 located under the steel disk that surrounds the copper tube. The effect 300W is stamped into the metal.
Resistor 2 is located inside the E-CAT, anywhere.
Certainly, a strong electric heater intuitive across E-CAT could boil the water. The only thing I can assume that contradicts what is the measurement of input current and voltage.
Mats Lewan, New Technology May 3, 2011 23:47
- - -
Reply to Balabu
The water column that provides back pressure is at most 200 mm, resulting in an increase in the boiling temperature of 0.5 degrees Celsius (0.1 degrees per 0.37 percent increase in pressure). See comment in the report of the test 28 April (downloadable with the link above next to the article).
I may of course add that cooking inside the energy catalyst both heard and felt clearly at all times, right through the thick insulation.
Mats Lewan, New Technology May 3, 2011 14:34
- - -
Response to Karl On [ ??!! I can't find the Question !!?? ]
Rossi has confirmed this to me now. However, no details are clear.
Mats Lewan, New Technology 2 May 2011 22:19
- - -
Reply to Olle
The tests were made on our initiatives. The first was planned, the second, we added because I wanted to check several things at once, including the steam flow and the calibration of temperature probe in boiling water.
Rossi has what I understand in this situation no vested interest in convincing all through a perfect and flawless test design with one hundred percent calorimetry.
The data that I have been able to measure is said to be the best we can get right now. Room for doubt is still, of course.
Mats Lewan, New Technology 2 May 2011 22:25
- - - -
Reply to J.A.
As I understand it can steam around 100 degrees do not carry more than 5% water in the liquid phase. Someone feel free to confirm or deny the task.
Mats Lewan, New Technology 2 May 2011 13:02
- - - -
Reply to Jenkki
The voltage was measured with my multimeter, but not continuously.
The stream was measured continuously with ampere meter in the picture. It is true that I only measured at zero - I realized this the day after I wrote the report and realized that someone would point out the deficiency. Of course it is theoretically possible to lead a strörre current through the phase and divide it between neutral and earth, provided that the RCD is inoperative or that the earth is connected in the bridge to zero in the connector.
However, I have discussed this with Rossi and Levi and concluded that it is unlikely for several reasons:
1st Levi measured during its 18-hour test input power with a meter that also controls the current through zero.
2nd We test on 14 January in the same room triggered the room when one of RCD värmeresistanserna broke and short conclusion to the ground. GFCI was therefore in operation at least at the earlier time.
3rd E-cat was tested on a variety of locations in a variety of facilities, and personally I consider it unlikely that Rossi would be on implementing a so easily seen through but still relatively difficult to implement trick in all these places.
4th In previous tests, it has been about average effects of 10 kW and the instantaneous effects of over 100 kW. It's getting a lot of cross-section of ordinary electrical cables.
5th If the wall switch is manipulated has to take in the order 10A of the Earth - in previous experiments around 40A. There should be a direct safety hazard on the premises.
Mats Lewan, New Technology 2 May 2011 12:52
- - - -
Response to B;ad (google: Leaf !) [ CHECKED CONTROL BOX ]
One must, of course, measuring the box as it is the total power input we are looking for.
I and all the others before me have inspected the box inside. It contains no batteries or other energy source, just a bit of electronics and the most air.
Mats Lewan, New Technology 2 May 2011 12:55
-- - -
Reply to CGN
The voltage was measured with my multimeter. 236V.
Not the waveform. However, I inspected the wall and believes that it is unlikely that it sat electronics affecting waveform. Computers, including my own, and telephones, was connected to the same power outlet, and two sockets used in the two tests.
Mats Lewan, New Technology 2 May 2011 12:58
- - - -
