The Clinton Administration had been acutely aware BL many years prior to the Bush administration. BL could not be considered a new phenomenon by any stretch of the imagination when the Bush administration took over.
Hell, during the changeover, Clinton and Bush had a joint security meeting to brief bush, and Clinton told him, point blank, "Bin Laden will be the most important thing to deal with in your presidency". On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 6:04 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > From John Berry > >> But interestingly, the FBI officially confirmed that there is no >> hard evidence connecting Osama bin Laden to the 9/11 attacks. >> The FBI never put the head of al-Qaeda on the wanted list for the >> attacks, nor are there any other formal charges - which exist for >> several other of the involved terrorists. >> The connection between Bin Laden and the 9/11 attacks was made by >> the Bush administration, at the morning of the attacks, before the >> first tower even collapsed. Nearly ten years later, after intensive >> investigation, a government commission, two wars and the >> interrogation under torture of some 750 people detained in Guantanamo >> Bay without charges, no hard evidence could be found that would confirm >> the initial allegation. >> None the less, the same unfounded 11 am allegation of the Bush >> administration is repeated by countless people, in media and government, >> even today and possibly ad infinitum. > > The implication of this post seems to infer that there is no credible "hard > evidence" to support a hypothesis that BL & Co. was involved in bringing > down the Twin Towers. Perhaps a refresher course consisting of a recovered > video of BL personally talking about the planning and implementation of 9/11 > to followers of his cause (video shot in Afghanistan back in 2001) of will > help straighten out any disinformation on this matter. > > http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/feature?section=news/national_world&id=8106572 > > The Clinton Administration had been acutely aware BL many years prior to the > Bush administration. BL could not be considered a new phenomenon by any > stretch of the imagination when the Bush administration took over. > > Incidentally, I have no desire to debate the wisdom of the Bush > administration -connecting-the-dots- and deciding to "liberate" Iraq other > than to say it was a horribly foolish endeavor - and that I'm mad as hell > that I was led to believe that WMD existed there. Too many lives have been > lost or maimed in the process. However, to infer that BL was not involved in > 9/11 strikes me as a woefully ignorant hypothesis to support. > > Regards, > Steven Vincent Johnson > www.OrionWorks.com > www.zazzle.com/orionworks > >
