“the final design for the control system is not in place yet,”
This fact has crossed my mind. The control system for the 1 MeV mature Rossi reactor would be completely computerized and directed. A SCADA system would monitor the temperature of the water, reaction vessel, and catalyst on all 300 units. An integrated command and control (CC) system would coordinate the power output of the reactor by automatically adjusting the input electric power and/or the hydrogen pressure to each of the 300 units without detailed human intervention. Module failure or servicing needs would be detected automatically by the computer and the CC system would issue an alarm to the operator along with the generation of an associated trouble ticket. Such an automated control system would take a year or two to develop if everything goes just right. On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > The last part is a slime-job deluxe. Even in my estimation, being no Rossi > fan-boy, it is disproportionate in emphasis, due to the time delay, and the > possibility of Mafia involvement. I saw the long version, and it may have > been shortened since then. > > If they really wanted to slime him so badly, they should have looked into > the Thermoelectric fiasco in New Hampshire, recently cited - since it is > more recent in time and in its similarity to the E-Cat - and especially in > the way that poor craftsmanship can come back to haunt the lone inventor. I > would like to hear his response to the LTI boondoggle, but no doubt their US > attorneys have put a muzzle on that. > > There are two views of the blue box in the interview from both sides, which > looks to be an updated version of the one from January - and in both views > (front and back) only two modules seem to be used during the recent tests. > Perhaps temperature control is not as important as previously thought. > > The further problem for believing the story of 170 mew reactors is that it > is probable that the final design for the control system is not in place > yet, AND he says he is still working on the catalyst, as well. Do you build > lots of units when your final design is not in place and you could need to > add a different catalyst? > > ... just one more reason to doubt that we may see the kind of demo from > Rossi which will convince skeptics that there has been a major breakthrough > in Ni-H. > > However, a convincing demo from a third party, not associated with Rossi is > becoming more likely every day. > > Jones > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jed Rothwell > > Ridiculous voice over text, but great close-ups! > > Akira Shirakawa wrote: > > > Now available in English: > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzL3RIlcwbY > > http://www.rainews24.rai.it/it/video.php?id=23096 > > This is the same video at two different sites. > > - Jed > > > >
