In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Mon, 09 May 2011 19:11:08 -0400: Hi, [snip] >WOW! Am I reading this patent right? Rossis patent seems to bet everything on >Ni62 to cu as THE important reaction.
Note "All the other Ni isotopes, on the other hand, will generate unstable Cu, and, accordingly, a beta decay." IOW the emphasis is on Ni62 purely because it will not produce radioactive isotopes. IMO that means he thinks that for general use, the isotopes Ni62/Ni64 should be extracted from Ni first and used exclusively in the device, if that device is intended for public use. > >Fron Rossi patent US 2011/0005506 Al >The positron forms the electron antiparticle, and >hence, as positrons impact against the nickel electrons, the >electron-positron pairs are annihilated, thereby generating a >huge amount of energy. >[0036] In fact, few grams of Ni and H would produce an >energy amount equivalent to that of thousands oil tons, as it >will become more apparent hereinafter, without pollutions, >greenhouse effects, or carbon dioxide increases, nuclear and >other waste materials, since the radioactive copper isotopes >produced in the process will decay to stable nickel isotopes by >beta+processes, in a very short time. >[0037] For clearly understanding the following detailed >discussion of the apparatus, it is necessary to at first consider >that for allowing nickel to be transformed into stable copper, >it is necessary to respect the quantic laws. Accordingly, it is >indispensable to use, for the above mentioned exothermal >reactions, a nickel isotope having a mass number of 62, to >allow it to transform into a stable copper isotope 62. All the >other Ni isotopes, on the other hand, will generate unstable >Cu, and, accordingly, a beta decay. > >From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 6:08 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:NyTeknik reports on Rossi patent > >From: noone noone > > >1) The reactor vessel is composed of stainless steel that does not >contain copper. >Not according to the patent. > > 2) Copper appears in the nickel powder. >Yes, and it gets there by a scientifically valid process. > It's pretty obvious that nickel is transmuting to copper. >Nonsense. Nickel is a very stable nucleus and does not transmute into copper >easily. Copper only gets into the powder by the known route of Galvanic >migration. >Please spare us this anti-science Fan-boy bogosity. >Jones > Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
